**Sem2 English2**
**Section Id :** 640653105946
**Section Number :** 13
**Section type :** Online
**Mandatory or Optional :** Mandatory
**Number of Questions :** 33
**Number of Questions to be attempted :** 33
**Section Marks :** 50
**Display Number Panel :** Yes
**Section Negative Marks :** 0
**Group All Questions :** No
**Enable Mark as Answered Mark for Review and**
No
**Clear Response :**
**Section Maximum Duration :** 0
**Section Minimum Duration :** 0
**Section Time In :** Minutes
**Maximum Instruction Time :** 0
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Read the speech segment given below and fill in the blanks with the appropriate discourse
markers. Observe the tone and the punctuation of the passage and choose only the most fitting
answer for every blank.
David Foster Wallace on Entertainment
Every year, the culture gets more and more hostile. Hostile, [i] _____, angry– just [that] it becomes
more and more difficult to ask people to read or to look at a piece of art for an hour, or to listen to
a piece of music that’s complicated and that takes work to understand because, [ii] _____, there are
a lot of reasons, but [iii] _____ now, in computer and internet culture, everything is so fast and the
faster things go, the more we feed that part of ourselves, but don’t feed the part of ourselves that
likes…that likes quiet. It seems significant that we don’t want things to be quiet ever anymore. And
that seems to me to have something to do with the fact that we feel like the purpose of our life is
to gratify ourselves and to get things for ourselves and to be on the go all the time, [but] there’s
this other part of us– a part that is [iv] _____ hungry for silence and quiet and thinking really hard
about the same thing for [v] _____ half an hour instead of 30 seconds that doesn’t get fed at all.
And it makes itself felt in the body in a kind of dread in here (touches chest).
Transcribed from: “David Foster Wallace on Entertainment.” YouTube, uploaded by
zoombockerman, 8 Dec. 2022.
Based on the above data, answer the given subquestions.
Fill in blank [i] with the most fitting discourse marker among the options given below.
6406535110187.
Apparently
6406535110188.
Like
6406535110189.
Prospectively
6406535110190.
For a start
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Read the speech segment given below and fill in the blanks with the appropriate discourse
markers. Observe the tone and the punctuation of the passage and choose only the most fitting
answer for every blank.
David Foster Wallace on Entertainment
Every year, the culture gets more and more hostile. Hostile, [i] _____, angry– just [that] it becomes
more and more difficult to ask people to read or to look at a piece of art for an hour, or to listen to
a piece of music that’s complicated and that takes work to understand because, [ii] _____, there are
a lot of reasons, but [iii] _____ now, in computer and internet culture, everything is so fast and the
faster things go, the more we feed that part of ourselves, but don’t feed the part of ourselves that
likes…that likes quiet. It seems significant that we don’t want things to be quiet ever anymore. And
that seems to me to have something to do with the fact that we feel like the purpose of our life is
to gratify ourselves and to get things for ourselves and to be on the go all the time, [but] there’s
this other part of us– a part that is [iv] _____ hungry for silence and quiet and thinking really hard
about the same thing for [v] _____ half an hour instead of 30 seconds that doesn’t get fed at all.
And it makes itself felt in the body in a kind of dread in here (touches chest).
Transcribed from: “David Foster Wallace on Entertainment.” YouTube, uploaded by
zoombockerman, 8 Dec. 2022.
Based on the above data, answer the given subquestions.
Fill in blank [ii] with the most fitting discourse marker among the options given below.
6406535110191.
Sort of
6406535110192.
Kind of
6406535110193.
Well
6406535110194.
In conclusion
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Read the speech segment given below and fill in the blanks with the appropriate discourse
markers. Observe the tone and the punctuation of the passage and choose only the most fitting
answer for every blank.
David Foster Wallace on Entertainment
Every year, the culture gets more and more hostile. Hostile, [i] _____, angry– just [that] it becomes
more and more difficult to ask people to read or to look at a piece of art for an hour, or to listen to
a piece of music that’s complicated and that takes work to understand because, [ii] _____, there are
a lot of reasons, but [iii] _____ now, in computer and internet culture, everything is so fast and the
faster things go, the more we feed that part of ourselves, but don’t feed the part of ourselves that
likes…that likes quiet. It seems significant that we don’t want things to be quiet ever anymore. And
that seems to me to have something to do with the fact that we feel like the purpose of our life is
to gratify ourselves and to get things for ourselves and to be on the go all the time, [but] there’s
this other part of us– a part that is [iv] _____ hungry for silence and quiet and thinking really hard
about the same thing for [v] _____ half an hour instead of 30 seconds that doesn’t get fed at all.
And it makes itself felt in the body in a kind of dread in here (touches chest).
Transcribed from: “David Foster Wallace on Entertainment.” YouTube, uploaded by
zoombockerman, 8 Dec. 2022.
Based on the above data, answer the given subquestions.
Fill in blank [iii] with the most fitting discourse marker among the options given below.
6406535110195.
In summary
6406535110196.
Furthermore
6406535110197.
On the one hand
6406535110198.
Particularly
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Read the speech segment given below and fill in the blanks with the appropriate discourse
markers. Observe the tone and the punctuation of the passage and choose only the most fitting
answer for every blank.
David Foster Wallace on Entertainment
Every year, the culture gets more and more hostile. Hostile, [i] _____, angry– just [that] it becomes
more and more difficult to ask people to read or to look at a piece of art for an hour, or to listen to
a piece of music that’s complicated and that takes work to understand because, [ii] _____, there are
a lot of reasons, but [iii] _____ now, in computer and internet culture, everything is so fast and the
faster things go, the more we feed that part of ourselves, but don’t feed the part of ourselves that
likes…that likes quiet. It seems significant that we don’t want things to be quiet ever anymore. And
that seems to me to have something to do with the fact that we feel like the purpose of our life is
to gratify ourselves and to get things for ourselves and to be on the go all the time, [but] there’s
this other part of us– a part that is [iv] _____ hungry for silence and quiet and thinking really hard
about the same thing for [v] _____ half an hour instead of 30 seconds that doesn’t get fed at all.
And it makes itself felt in the body in a kind of dread in here (touches chest).
Transcribed from: “David Foster Wallace on Entertainment.” YouTube, uploaded by
zoombockerman, 8 Dec. 2022.
Based on the above data, answer the given subquestions.
Fill in blank [iv] with the most fitting discourse marker among the options given below.
6406535110199.
Almost
6406535110200.
Such as
6406535110201.
Fine
6406535110202.
Anyway
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Read the speech segment given below and fill in the blanks with the appropriate discourse
markers. Observe the tone and the punctuation of the passage and choose only the most fitting
answer for every blank.
David Foster Wallace on Entertainment
Every year, the culture gets more and more hostile. Hostile, [i] _____, angry– just [that] it becomes
more and more difficult to ask people to read or to look at a piece of art for an hour, or to listen to
a piece of music that’s complicated and that takes work to understand because, [ii] _____, there are
a lot of reasons, but [iii] _____ now, in computer and internet culture, everything is so fast and the
faster things go, the more we feed that part of ourselves, but don’t feed the part of ourselves that
likes…that likes quiet. It seems significant that we don’t want things to be quiet ever anymore. And
that seems to me to have something to do with the fact that we feel like the purpose of our life is
to gratify ourselves and to get things for ourselves and to be on the go all the time, [but] there’s
this other part of us– a part that is [iv] _____ hungry for silence and quiet and thinking really hard
about the same thing for [v] _____ half an hour instead of 30 seconds that doesn’t get fed at all.
And it makes itself felt in the body in a kind of dread in here (touches chest).
Transcribed from: “David Foster Wallace on Entertainment.” YouTube, uploaded by
zoombockerman, 8 Dec. 2022.
Based on the above data, answer the given subquestions.
Fill in blank [v] with the most fitting discourse marker among the options given below.
6406535110203.
Finally
6406535110204.
Maybe
6406535110205.
Truth be told
6406535110206.
Consequently
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Given below is an excerpt from the essay “Gifts”, written by Ralph Waldo Emerson. Study the essay
and answer the given subquestions.
He is a good man, who can receive a gift well. We are either glad or sorry at a gift, and both
emotions are unbecoming. Some violence, I think, is done, some degradation borne, when I
rejoice or grieve at a gift. I am sorry when my independence is invaded, or when a gift comes from
such as do not know my spirit, and so the act is not supported; and if the gift pleases me
overmuch, then I should be ashamed that the donor should read my heart, and see that I love his
commodity, and not him. The gift, to be true, must be the flowing of the giver unto me,
correspondent to my flowing unto him. When the waters are at level, then my goods pass to him,
and his to me. All his are mine, all mine his. I say to him, How can you give me this pot of oil, or
this flagon of wine, when all your oil and wine is mine, which belief of mine this gift seems to
deny? Hence the fitness of beautiful, not useful things for gifts. This giving is flat usurpation, and
therefore when the beneficiary is ungrateful, as all beneficiaries hate all Timons, not at all
considering the value of the gift, but looking back to the greater store it was taken from, I rather
sympathize with the beneficiary, than with the anger of my lord Timon. For, the expectation of
gratitude is mean, and is continually punished by the total insensibility of the obliged person. It is
a great happiness to get off without injury and heart-burning, from one who has had the ill luck to
be served by you. It is a very onerous business, this of being served, and the debtor naturally
wishes to give you a slap. A golden text for these gentlemen is that which I so admire in the
Buddhist, who never thanks, and who says, "Do not flatter your benefactors."
The reason of these discords I conceive to be that there is no commensurability between a man
and any gift. You cannot give anything to a magnanimous person. After you have served him, he
at once puts you in debt by his magnanimity. The service a man renders his friend is trivial and
selfish, compared with the service he knows his friend stood in readiness to yield him, alike before
he had begun to serve his friend, and now also. Compared with that good-will I bear my friend,
the benefit it is in my power to render him seems small. When I have attempted to join myself to
others by services, it proved an intellectual trick-- no more. They eat your service like apples, and
leave you out. But love them, and they feel you, and delight in you all the time.
Arrange the given hints in the correct order to form a synopsis of the essay.
i. The unpleasantness of being obligated
ii. Love as the most delightful gift
iii. The reason why beautiful things make the best gifts
iv. The conflict between the beneficiary and the benefactor with an allusion to Timon of Athens
v. The thoughts we have upon receiving a gift
vi. Comparison between goodwill and gifts
vii. The true meaning of a gift
6406535110207.
v-vii-iii-iv-i-vi-ii
6406535110208.
vi-v-iii-ii-iv-i-vii
6406535110209.
iii-i-vii-iv-vi-ii-v
6406535110210.
ii-vi-i-iii-v-iv-vii
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Given below is an excerpt from the essay “Gifts”, written by Ralph Waldo Emerson. Study the essay
and answer the given subquestions.
He is a good man, who can receive a gift well. We are either glad or sorry at a gift, and both
emotions are unbecoming. Some violence, I think, is done, some degradation borne, when I
rejoice or grieve at a gift. I am sorry when my independence is invaded, or when a gift comes from
such as do not know my spirit, and so the act is not supported; and if the gift pleases me
overmuch, then I should be ashamed that the donor should read my heart, and see that I love his
commodity, and not him. The gift, to be true, must be the flowing of the giver unto me,
correspondent to my flowing unto him. When the waters are at level, then my goods pass to him,
and his to me. All his are mine, all mine his. I say to him, How can you give me this pot of oil, or
this flagon of wine, when all your oil and wine is mine, which belief of mine this gift seems to
deny? Hence the fitness of beautiful, not useful things for gifts. This giving is flat usurpation, and
therefore when the beneficiary is ungrateful, as all beneficiaries hate all Timons, not at all
considering the value of the gift, but looking back to the greater store it was taken from, I rather
sympathize with the beneficiary, than with the anger of my lord Timon. For, the expectation of
gratitude is mean, and is continually punished by the total insensibility of the obliged person. It is
a great happiness to get off without injury and heart-burning, from one who has had the ill luck to
be served by you. It is a very onerous business, this of being served, and the debtor naturally
wishes to give you a slap. A golden text for these gentlemen is that which I so admire in the
Buddhist, who never thanks, and who says, "Do not flatter your benefactors."
The reason of these discords I conceive to be that there is no commensurability between a man
and any gift. You cannot give anything to a magnanimous person. After you have served him, he
at once puts you in debt by his magnanimity. The service a man renders his friend is trivial and
selfish, compared with the service he knows his friend stood in readiness to yield him, alike before
he had begun to serve his friend, and now also. Compared with that good-will I bear my friend,
the benefit it is in my power to render him seems small. When I have attempted to join myself to
others by services, it proved an intellectual trick-- no more. They eat your service like apples, and
leave you out. But love them, and they feel you, and delight in you all the time.
Why does the essayist refer to lord Timon?
6406535110211.
Lord Timon once gave the essayist a gift which he disliked
6406535110212.
Lord Timon is used here as an example, denoting gift-givers in general; it is
implied that he was famous for giving gifts
6406535110213.
Lord Timon commissioned this essay, so this essay is Emerson’s gift to Timon
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Given below is an excerpt from the essay “Gifts”, written by Ralph Waldo Emerson. Study the essay
and answer the given subquestions.
He is a good man, who can receive a gift well. We are either glad or sorry at a gift, and both
emotions are unbecoming. Some violence, I think, is done, some degradation borne, when I
rejoice or grieve at a gift. I am sorry when my independence is invaded, or when a gift comes from
such as do not know my spirit, and so the act is not supported; and if the gift pleases me
overmuch, then I should be ashamed that the donor should read my heart, and see that I love his
commodity, and not him. The gift, to be true, must be the flowing of the giver unto me,
correspondent to my flowing unto him. When the waters are at level, then my goods pass to him,
and his to me. All his are mine, all mine his. I say to him, How can you give me this pot of oil, or
this flagon of wine, when all your oil and wine is mine, which belief of mine this gift seems to
deny? Hence the fitness of beautiful, not useful things for gifts. This giving is flat usurpation, and
therefore when the beneficiary is ungrateful, as all beneficiaries hate all Timons, not at all
considering the value of the gift, but looking back to the greater store it was taken from, I rather
sympathize with the beneficiary, than with the anger of my lord Timon. For, the expectation of
gratitude is mean, and is continually punished by the total insensibility of the obliged person. It is
a great happiness to get off without injury and heart-burning, from one who has had the ill luck to
be served by you. It is a very onerous business, this of being served, and the debtor naturally
wishes to give you a slap. A golden text for these gentlemen is that which I so admire in the
Buddhist, who never thanks, and who says, "Do not flatter your benefactors."
The reason of these discords I conceive to be that there is no commensurability between a man
and any gift. You cannot give anything to a magnanimous person. After you have served him, he
at once puts you in debt by his magnanimity. The service a man renders his friend is trivial and
selfish, compared with the service he knows his friend stood in readiness to yield him, alike before
he had begun to serve his friend, and now also. Compared with that good-will I bear my friend,
the benefit it is in my power to render him seems small. When I have attempted to join myself to
others by services, it proved an intellectual trick-- no more. They eat your service like apples, and
leave you out. But love them, and they feel you, and delight in you all the time.
Which of the following is NOT true?
6406535110214.
The excerpt argues that man’s goodwill is greater than any gift
6406535110215.
The excerpt states that it is not noble to expect gratitude
6406535110216.
The excerpt states that only useful things are acceptable as gifts
6406535110217.
The excerpt states that you cannot give anything to a magnanimous person
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Given below is an excerpt from the essay “Gifts”, written by Ralph Waldo Emerson. Study the essay
and answer the given subquestions.
He is a good man, who can receive a gift well. We are either glad or sorry at a gift, and both
emotions are unbecoming. Some violence, I think, is done, some degradation borne, when I
rejoice or grieve at a gift. I am sorry when my independence is invaded, or when a gift comes from
such as do not know my spirit, and so the act is not supported; and if the gift pleases me
overmuch, then I should be ashamed that the donor should read my heart, and see that I love his
commodity, and not him. The gift, to be true, must be the flowing of the giver unto me,
correspondent to my flowing unto him. When the waters are at level, then my goods pass to him,
and his to me. All his are mine, all mine his. I say to him, How can you give me this pot of oil, or
this flagon of wine, when all your oil and wine is mine, which belief of mine this gift seems to
deny? Hence the fitness of beautiful, not useful things for gifts. This giving is flat usurpation, and
therefore when the beneficiary is ungrateful, as all beneficiaries hate all Timons, not at all
considering the value of the gift, but looking back to the greater store it was taken from, I rather
sympathize with the beneficiary, than with the anger of my lord Timon. For, the expectation of
gratitude is mean, and is continually punished by the total insensibility of the obliged person. It is
a great happiness to get off without injury and heart-burning, from one who has had the ill luck to
be served by you. It is a very onerous business, this of being served, and the debtor naturally
wishes to give you a slap. A golden text for these gentlemen is that which I so admire in the
Buddhist, who never thanks, and who says, "Do not flatter your benefactors."
The reason of these discords I conceive to be that there is no commensurability between a man
and any gift. You cannot give anything to a magnanimous person. After you have served him, he
at once puts you in debt by his magnanimity. The service a man renders his friend is trivial and
selfish, compared with the service he knows his friend stood in readiness to yield him, alike before
he had begun to serve his friend, and now also. Compared with that good-will I bear my friend,
the benefit it is in my power to render him seems small. When I have attempted to join myself to
others by services, it proved an intellectual trick-- no more. They eat your service like apples, and
leave you out. But love them, and they feel you, and delight in you all the time.
Study the nouns given below. On the basis of your reading of the passage, choose the option that
correctly matches the noun to its fitting adjective.
i. Usurpation
ii. Person
iii. Business
iv. Trick
Given below is an excerpt from the essay “Gifts”, written by Ralph Waldo Emerson. Study the essay
and answer the given subquestions.
He is a good man, who can receive a gift well. We are either glad or sorry at a gift, and both
emotions are unbecoming. Some violence, I think, is done, some degradation borne, when I
rejoice or grieve at a gift. I am sorry when my independence is invaded, or when a gift comes from
such as do not know my spirit, and so the act is not supported; and if the gift pleases me
overmuch, then I should be ashamed that the donor should read my heart, and see that I love his
commodity, and not him. The gift, to be true, must be the flowing of the giver unto me,
correspondent to my flowing unto him. When the waters are at level, then my goods pass to him,
and his to me. All his are mine, all mine his. I say to him, How can you give me this pot of oil, or
this flagon of wine, when all your oil and wine is mine, which belief of mine this gift seems to
deny? Hence the fitness of beautiful, not useful things for gifts. This giving is flat usurpation, and
therefore when the beneficiary is ungrateful, as all beneficiaries hate all Timons, not at all
considering the value of the gift, but looking back to the greater store it was taken from, I rather
sympathize with the beneficiary, than with the anger of my lord Timon. For, the expectation of
gratitude is mean, and is continually punished by the total insensibility of the obliged person. It is
a great happiness to get off without injury and heart-burning, from one who has had the ill luck to
be served by you. It is a very onerous business, this of being served, and the debtor naturally
wishes to give you a slap. A golden text for these gentlemen is that which I so admire in the
Buddhist, who never thanks, and who says, "Do not flatter your benefactors."
The reason of these discords I conceive to be that there is no commensurability between a man
and any gift. You cannot give anything to a magnanimous person. After you have served him, he
at once puts you in debt by his magnanimity. The service a man renders his friend is trivial and
selfish, compared with the service he knows his friend stood in readiness to yield him, alike before
he had begun to serve his friend, and now also. Compared with that good-will I bear my friend,
the benefit it is in my power to render him seems small. When I have attempted to join myself to
others by services, it proved an intellectual trick-- no more. They eat your service like apples, and
leave you out. But love them, and they feel you, and delight in you all the time.
He is a good man, who can receive a gift well.
Which of the following options can replace the word in italics without greatly altering the sense of
the statement?
6406535110222.
Begrudgingly
6406535110223.
Graciously
6406535110224.
Cautiously
6406535110225.
Whimsically
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Spot the viewpoint adverb in the given sentence.
“Historically, the great Indian patriarchy, or the paradigm of gendered labour woven into the
country’s socio-cultural DNA, has demanded women’s unpaid domestic labour and caregiving
duties.”
6406535110240.
Unpaid
6406535110241.
Woven
6406535110242.
Historically
6406535110243.
Caregiving
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Consider the italicised phrases in the following sentences:
i. Put the book there.
ii. Order the carriage around.
iii. She often talks to me.
They are adverbs of _____, _____, and _____ respectively.
6406535110248.
Manner, manner, frequency
6406535110249.
Manner, time, degree
6406535110250.
Degree, place, time
6406535110251.
Place, place, frequency
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Identify the degree adverb in the given sentence.
“The cellar is nearly filled up, never having been either wide or deep, and the fruit of a few mossy
apple−trees drops ungathered to the ground.”
6406535110264.
Few
6406535110265.
Filled
6406535110266.
Mossy
6406535110267.
Nearly
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Identify the adjectival clause in the following sentence and the noun it modifies.
After finishing her homework, which took several hours, she rewarded herself with a relaxing bubble
bath.
6406535110278.
Adjectival clause: she rewarded herself with a relaxing bubble bath, Noun:
bath
6406535110279.
Adjectival clause: which took several hours, Noun: homework
6406535110280.
Adjectival clause: she rewarded herself with a relaxing bubble bath, Noun:
bubble
6406535110281.
None of these
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Choose the correct modal verb to fill in the blank. See the hint or context provided and choose
only the most appropriate option to fill the blank.
Why _____ I concede my seat to her?
Hint: A wh-question that denies the relevance of a social requirement
6406535110317.
Would
6406535110318.
Could
6406535110319.
Should
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Choose the correct modal verb to fill in the blank. See the hint or context provided and choose
only the most appropriate option to fill the blank.
If the candidates or their agents have any specific complaint or problem regarding the conduct of
elections they _____ bring the same to the notice of the Observer appointed by the Election
Commission at the polling booth.
Hint: To show that an authoritative body is granting formal permission to someone to do
something
6406535110324.
Should
6406535110325.
Must
6406535110326.
Will
6406535110327.
May
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Choose the most appropriate form of asking for permission in a formal situation from the
following.
6406535110328.
May I borrow your pen please?
6406535110329.
Can I borrow your pen?
6406535110330.
Both May I borrow your pen please? and Can I borrow your pen?
6406535110331.
I might borrow your pen
**Business Analytics**
**Section Id :** 640653105947
**Section Number :** 14
**Section type :** Online
**Mandatory or Optional :** Mandatory
**Number of Questions :** 7
**Number of Questions to be attempted :** 7
**Section Marks :** 20
**Display Number Panel :** Yes
**Section Negative Marks :** 0
**Group All Questions :** No
**Enable Mark as Answered Mark for Review and**
No
**Clear Response :**
**Section Maximum Duration :** 0
**Section Minimum Duration :** 0
**Section Time In :** Minutes
**Maximum Instruction Time :** 0
A published solution is not available for this question yet.