You have been given a R × C chessboard, with a list of squares cut out. This problem will involve
placing rooks on a chessboard, so that they cannot attack each other. For a rook to attack a target
piece, it must share the same row or column as the target.
Find the maximum number of rooks that can be placed on the chessboard, such that no pair of
rooks can attack each other.
Rooks cannot be placed on cut out squares. The cut out squares do not affect where the rooks can
attack.
Based on the above data, answer the given subquestions.
You have been given a R × C chessboard, with a list of squares cut out. This problem will involve
placing rooks on a chessboard, so that they cannot attack each other. For a rook to attack a target
piece, it must share the same row or column as the target.
Find the maximum number of rooks that can be placed on the chessboard, such that no pair of
rooks can attack each other.
Rooks cannot be placed on cut out squares. The cut out squares do not affect where the rooks can
attack.
Based on the above data, answer the given subquestions.
What is the answer if R = C = N and all the squares on the topmost row and rightmost column (i.e,
a L-shape) are cut out?
You have been given a R × C chessboard, with a list of squares cut out. This problem will involve
placing rooks on a chessboard, so that they cannot attack each other. For a rook to attack a target
piece, it must share the same row or column as the target.
Find the maximum number of rooks that can be placed on the chessboard, such that no pair of
rooks can attack each other.
Rooks cannot be placed on cut out squares. The cut out squares do not affect where the rooks can
attack.
Based on the above data, answer the given subquestions.
Consider the following bipartite graph: the set A is composed of elements corresponding to every
row of the board, while set B consists of the columns. For each row add edges to every column if
the corresponding square is not cut out of the board. What does the answer correspond to in this
graph?
6406532333069.
the maximum vertex degree
6406532333070.
the number of edges in a minimum spanning forest
6406532333071.
the size of a maximum matching
6406532333072.
none of these
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
You have been given a R × C chessboard, with a list of squares cut out. This problem will involve
placing rooks on a chessboard, so that they cannot attack each other. For a rook to attack a target
piece, it must share the same row or column as the target.
Find the maximum number of rooks that can be placed on the chessboard, such that no pair of
rooks can attack each other.
Rooks cannot be placed on cut out squares. The cut out squares do not affect where the rooks can
attack.
Based on the above data, answer the given subquestions.
What is the number of valid placements of N mutually non-attacking rooks if R = C = N and there are
no cut out squares? Two placements are distinct if there is at least one square which has a rook in
one of them and does not have a rook in the other.
6406532333073.
2N
6406532333074.
2\(^{N}\)
6406532333075.
N!
6406532333076.
N\(^{2}\)
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
The three-bonaci numbers are defined as follows (please read the definition carefully, as it may
not be the generalization of the popular Fibonacci numbers that you might expect):
Based on the above data, answer the given subquestions.
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
The three-bonaci numbers are defined as follows (please read the definition carefully, as it may
not be the generalization of the popular Fibonacci numbers that you might expect):
Based on the above data, answer the given subquestions.
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
The three-bonaci numbers are defined as follows (please read the definition carefully, as it may
not be the generalization of the popular Fibonacci numbers that you might expect):
Based on the above data, answer the given subquestions.
A published solution is not available for this question yet.
Recall that the size of an optimal vertex cover is at most twice the size of a maximum matching of
a graph G. Are there examples of graphs where the size of the optimal vertex cover is **exactly**
**equal** to twice the size of its maximum matching? For example, this is not true for a path on three
vertices: the size of both the maximum matching and minimum vertex cover is 1.
6406532333104.
Yes
6406532333105.
No
**SPG**
**Section Id :** 64065349297
**Section Number :** 8
**Section type :** Online
**Mandatory or Optional :** Mandatory
**Number of Questions :** 23
**Number of Questions to be attempted :** 23
**Section Marks :** 40
**Display Number Panel :** Yes
**Section Negative Marks :** 0
**Group All Questions :** No
**Enable Mark as Answered Mark for Review and**
Yes
**Clear Response :**
**Maximum Instruction Time :** 0
A published solution is not available for this question yet.